Featured

Integration Week Day 3 – 29/04/20

Worked all day. Below is the notes taken through out the day and the timestamps:

Finished updating issues on Git – 10:26 am.

Git Repository looks good. Added folders into dev that correspond with every day we had a meeting. This should have been updated throughout the project

Added files into the weekly dev folders from old uploads to the git. (2:34pm)

Featured

Integration Week – Day 2

Worked all day. Below is the notes taken throughout the day along with time stamps:

Finished updating issues on the Gitlab 11am.

Decomposition Description:

  1. Added cell classes, WordType and TestResults to the significant classes.
  2. Updated class mapping.

(Finished 1:30 pm)

Created a txt file to record software builds and tests failed. (Finished 2:20 pm)

Reviewed the test spec document. Everything is in line with QA 06. All the changes are what Chris requested. the only thing I need to clarify with das82 is what is meant by repeatable tests. (Finished 3:10pm)

Reviewed new code:

  1. Class/variable names fine.
  2. All words in American English.
  3. Indentation correct.
  4. Layout correct i.e Variables/constructor/methods all in correct order.
  5. Some java docs missing.
  6. Still need to fix package name.

Featured

Integration Week Day 1 – 27/4/20

Below is the notes taken through out the day along with time stamps when the tasks were completed.

Finished adding to do list as issues on the git lab at 10:27am.

When checking the code against the QA a few things I noticed:

  1. Packages must start with uk.ac.aber.cs221.group03.
  2. Each file should have a simple header giving the filename, a copyright message, and the version and date. (This will be completed with the java docs).

Apart from that everything seems inline with the QA standards. Really clean work. (Code check finished 11:45).

According to the QA 10 doc the test report does not need an introduction. Instead I have created the layout of the report along with the tables of the system tests and module tests (Finished 11:17 am).

Leaving the java docs until the changes made last time are checked/corrected.

Looked through UI spec and mock up. Everything is according to QA.04. (2:30 pm)

Featured

Eighth Week – 24/03/20

With the UK in quarantine all meetings moved online. The formal review for the design document was done this week, as well as an informal meeting to show members not on the architecture team how the code functions.

Formal review of design document – 2 hours

Architecture meeting – 1 hour 30 mins

Downloaded code and set up Intellij ready to edit java docs – 1 hour

Featured

Seventh Week – 17/3/20

This week I followed up on QA feedback from the test document review. I also created issues on the Gitlab according to the rest of Chris’ review. I went through the updates Merlin made to the UI use case document and PowerPoint. I again compared this to the feedback we got from our Project Manager. Lastly, I ensured I was ready for the design specification review.

Updating Repository – 1 hour

Checking UI Documents – 2 hour

Creating issues – 1 hour

Going over design specification lecutures and QA . documents – 1 hour

Featured

Fifth Week – 02/03/20

This week was the group needed a full test document sheet ready to be forwarded to Chris, so we organised a formal testing document review. This was done on the 26/02/20. After the review took place, Halvor took charge in showing us how to use the Gitlab repository. I then focused on looking at the other SE.QA docs in preparation for the design document.

Formal testing document review – 2 hour

Gitlab repository session – 1 hour

Preparation for the design document review – 2 hour

Featured

Fourth Week 17/2/20

This week the formal review of the UI Document was due. The review was conducted on the 19/2/20 and minutes were taken by me to report the errors and what the document was lacking. Also during this time two members of our group were still not signed up to gitlab so I followed up on that. Lastly I looked over SE.QA.06 – Test Procedure Standards as that will be the next document due for review.

Formal review of UI document – 2 hours

Revising SE.QA.06 and SE.QA.07 – 2 hours

Featured

Second Week 10/2/20

I have been assigned the task of QA manager for the project. As there is no work currently finished and waiting to be processed by QA, I have spent time going through all the QA documents to prepare.

3 Hours – Going through all the documents and taking note of what I am looking for when assessing a piece of work. I have especially focused on SE.QA.04 (the user interface document) as this is the first section of the project that will be reviewed.

Create your own website, free on WordPress.com.Create your own website.
Start free